Timely and relevant thoracic oncology news brought to you by the only global association dedicated to the multidisciplinary study of lung cancer.

Timely and relevant thoracic oncology news brought to you by the only global association dedicated to the multidisciplinary study of lung cancer.

In Brief for November 19, 2025

The US FDA confirms the use of pembrolizumab and berahyaluronidase alfa-pmph as an injectable therapy for solid tumor indications.

By

Taylor Fithian

Estimated Read Time:

1–2 minutes

Evolving Standards of Care, Industry News & Regulatory Approvals

On September 19, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved pembrolizumab and berahyaluronidase alfa-pmph for subcutaneous injection for solid tumor indications in which intravenous pembrolizumab is accepted. This is for individuals 12 and older.1

This approval is based on results from a phase III randomized, multicenter, open-label, active-controlled MK-3475A-D77 study, which was conducted in 377 patients with previously untreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 alterations. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either pembrolizumab and berahyaluronidase alfa-pmph subcutaneously every 6 weeks with chemotherapy or intravenous pembrolizumab, along with chemotherapy.2

The trial included dual primary endpoints of pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure measures of cycle 1 (AUC 0-6 weeks) and cycle 3 steady-state trough concentration (Ctrough) of pembrolizumab.Secondary endpoints included additional PK exposure measures, pembrolizumab immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety.Descriptive efficacy outcome measures were overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).1

The trial met the predefined acceptance margin for the PK endpoints with the lower boundary (96% confidence interval [CI] for cycle 1 AUC 0-6 weeksand 94% CI for cycle 3 Ctrough) of the geometric mean ratios (GMR) above the pre-specified threshold of 0.8 for comparability. The confirmed ORR was 45% (95% CI: 39, 52) in the subcutaneous pembrolizumab and berahyaluronidase alfa-pmph arm, and 42% (95% CI: 33, 51) in the intravenous pembrolizumab arm.1

Response rates were comparable between subcutaneous (45%) and intravenous (42%) routes, with no significant difference. These routes resulted in similar PFS and OS rates among patients.1


References:


About the Authors

Taylor Fithian

Taylor Fithian

Contributing Writer