Timely and relevant thoracic oncology news brought to you by the only global association dedicated to the multidisciplinary study of lung cancer.

Timely and relevant thoracic oncology news brought to you by the only global association dedicated to the multidisciplinary study of lung cancer.

Predicting Early Weight Loss in Radiotherapy

By

Dirk De Ruysscher, MD, PhD

Estimated Read Time:

3–4 minutes

Evolving Standards of Care
Dirk De Ruysscher, MD, PhD
Dirk De Ruysscher, MD, PhD

Early weight loss during radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is well-known to be associated with decreased progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).1,2 Particularly in patients receiving concurrent CRT, weight loss is a frequent, often expected, occurrence.

It is suggested that prevention of weight loss with early nutritional intervention and physical activity may improve the patient’s compliance with treatment, decrease side effects, and improve PFS and OS.3 However, high-level evidence is lacking. It is also likely that not all weight loss can be prevented with nutritional intervention, as the mechanisms may be diverse, including such causes as decreased food intake due to esophagitis as well as systemic inflammation. The former will likely benefit from dietary measures, and the latter less so.

Nevertheless, identifying patients who are at risk for early weight loss during CRT could result in targeted interventions for only those patients who are most likely to need it, thus saving resources. In the study of Han et al.,4 a clinical decision support system was created on the basis of radiomics, dosiomics extracted from CT scans, and 3D dose-volume parameters. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 0.35 to 0.40, and the negative predictive value (NPV) 0.76 to 0.82. These were better than the predictions of physicians, whose performance was close to randomness.

A major caveat of this interesting prospective study, aside from its small size with 37 patients, is that physicians had to predict severe weight loss at the time of patient intake without knowledge of the dose distribution, for instance, to the esophagus. It is possible this insight might have increased the accuracy of clinicians’ predictions. Physicians tend to make predictions with a high NPV and a low PPV in an effort to avoid overlooking a patient at risk for developing side effects. The study did not assess sarcopenia at the time of diagnosis, which is a well-known prognostic factor for weight loss and poor PFS and OS.5 It is therefore unclear whether the current model predicts only weight loss that is due to decreased intake because of mechanical reasons such as esophagitis, or whether biochemical mechanisms were also considered.

Regardless, the Han study adds to the body of evidence demonstrating that emerging techniques such as radiomics and dosiomics, together with artificial intelligence, can improve prognostic and predictive models and aid clinical decision making. However, to achieve  clinical implementation, rigorous testing in high-quality studies with sufficient power is needed.6 At the same time, “explainable artificial intelligence” may be needed to make the algorithm reliable and versatile enough for clinicians to understand the boundaries for its use, similar to inclusion and exclusion criteria in regular clinical trials. If that is realized, models such as that of Han et al. will become as common as a stethoscope in daily clinical care.


References:

 


About the Authors

Dirk De Ruysscher, MD, PhD

Dirk De Ruysscher, MD, PhD

Dr. De Ruysscher is with the Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic), Maastricht University Medical Centre, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands.